P R I N C E A N D R E W
One cannot speculate as to innocence or guilt, but in England the Sexual Offences Act 2003, makes a person accused guilty until proven innocent, rather than innocent, until proven guilty. English law is thus in direct confrontation with the basic human right accorded to murderers, fraudsters, burglars and those guilty of assault. All of which are treated as innocent when investigated and charged, as per Article 6 of the European Convention, and Human Rights Act 1998.
The claims of Virginia Roberts appear sufficiently supported by photographic evidence, and other travel logs, plus the conviction of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, for that/those alleged offences to be investigated. Hence, it is likely the former British Navy Vice Admiral, would be found guilty. The laws in the USA are equally backbreaking, where the age of consent is even higher than in the UK.
But, this is all speculation, based on the allegations, and presumably, the testimony of Ms Roberts.
SKY NEWS 15 NOVEMBER 2022 - KING CHARLES ASKS PARLIAMENT FOR MAJOR CHANGE INVOLVING PRINCE
WILLIAM AND PRINCE HARRY
Prince Andrew and Prince Charles during a public engagement.
The United Kingdom does not yet have a Written Constitution. This allows Courts considerable latitude in finding one way one day, and finding another in other cases. Useful if you want to control decisions, to prevent justice for troublemakers. To make matters worse the police and Crown Prosecution Service, are riddled with Masonry. Including many Magistrates, Crown, Appeal, and High Court judges. Even the Planning Inspectorate.
This may not mean much to the ordinary man or woman, provided that they tow the party line, and do not ask questions or challenge the system. The moment a citizen of the UK smells a rat, and blows the whistle, all manner of unfortunate events may befall them. From not getting planning consent, when in identical circumstances, a neighboring application does. To a complete frame up, to get you discredited and locked up.
To begin with the punishment for asking awkward questions is relatively gentle. But as challenges mount, such as revealing corruption in local politics. Fraud and planning favours will not be investigated. Instead, the informant will be arrested, his house searched, computers and mobile phones confiscated - for starters.
They turn the whole life of their targets upside down. The 'South African,' is not an isolated case. But, one of many.
If that does not deter a person, a council might visit premises umpteen times. In case of The Bulldog, it is well over 190 enforcement visits. And some dozen or more police raids.
The object is to grind their target down. Make it so that they cannot operate. Steal legal papers, to be used against their victim. And generally abuse laws, such as anti-terrorist, or anti-money laundering statute, to track every move that the whistleblower might make.
Not having an effective remedy, the target loses friends and family. And becomes an outcast. Mainly because, in not understanding what is going on behind the scenes, they tend to think the worst.
Thus giving neighbors with a grudge, ammunition that, as you will see, they use with relish. Many tripping over their own tongues, as they too fall into the trap of believing the gossip, when in reality it is has been fabricated. Malicious gossip is of course slander, if it is not true. Malicious gossip in emails, or other written communications, is libel.
Incompatibility in Human Rights terms, is where one statute does not comply with HR statute. The European Convention does include Article 13, the right to an effective remedy.
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION
and injustice is such a big thing, that the subject is included in the
Development Goals (SDGs). There is a United Nations Convention
Against Corruption. As per General Assembly resolution 58/4 of 31 October 2003.
'The (Colonial) British Bulldog' did not know what he was up against when he moved into a rural location in 1981, with Sussex police being named in Hansard, as the most corrupt police force, after investigation by Hampshire and Kent Constabularies, on the murder of the unarmed, James Ashley, during an armed raid (based on fabricated evidence) in the early hours of the morning.