K I N G C H A R L E S I I I
Find your way using our MORAL COMPASS or revisit our LANDING PAGE
To his credit, King Charles III has long spoken about climate change and plastic pollution. Though, he did not attend COP27, he organized a get together at Buckingham Palace beforehand.
The King, above most other UK citizens, will know and understand only too well, that a sexual allegation, whether true or false, is extremely damaging to the person affected and surrounding family, in this case his brother Prince Andrew. But that a fraudulent conviction and subsequent imprisonment, would be utterly devastating. And even more so, where there is no right of appeal, or other effective remedy, contrary to Article 13 of the HRA 1998 - but oops, there is no Article 13 in the HRA, though it is in the European Convention and Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948. Thus prolonging the injustice, being mental torture, contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention.
His mother, Queen Elizabeth had been asked to look at the lack of remedy in relation to planning crime and Wealden District Council, with a cover up by Sussex police, that would, or should have led to the rights and wrongs of a citizen wrongly convicted, allegedly, being reopened. Where there is no Right of Appeal in the UK at present. She declined.
The baton thus passes to King Charles as the new head of state, as per the 1689 Bill of Rights. As seen below, the King can ask Parliament to look at matters that may come to his attention, and/or, may need redress.
SKY NEWS 15 NOVEMBER 2022 - KING CHARLES ASKS PARLIAMENT FOR MAJOR CHANGE INVOLVING PRINCE ANDREW AND PRINCE HARRY
appears from the latest moves by the King, that he may not be either fit
enough, or have the spare mental capacity to deal with a complex range
of legal matters. Whereas, his mother, Queen Elizabeth is known to dealt
with numerous complex matters herself, although shying away from helping
to resolve corruption at Wealden District Council. Hence, even she was
thought to have been lacking when it came to issues that showed the
State to be wanting.
The United Kingdom does not yet have a Written Constitution. This allows Courts considerable latitude in finding one way one day, and finding another in other cases. Useful if you want to control decisions, to prevent justice for troublemakers. To make matters worse the police and Crown Prosecution Service, are riddled with Masonry. Including many Magistrates, Crown, Appeal, and High Court judges. Even the Planning Inspectorate.
This may not mean much to the ordinary man or woman, provided that they tow the party line, and do not ask questions or challenge the system. The moment a citizen of the UK smells a rat, and blows the whistle, all manner of unfortunate events may befall them. From not getting planning consent, when in identical circumstances, a neighboring application does. To a complete frame up, to get you discredited and locked up.
To begin with the punishment for asking awkward questions is relatively gentle. But as challenges mount, such as revealing corruption in local politics. Fraud and planning favours will not be investigated. Instead, the informant will be arrested, his house searched, computers and mobile phones confiscated - for starters.
They turn the whole life of their targets upside down. The 'South African,' is not an isolated case. But, one of many.
If that does not deter a person, a council might visit premises umpteen times. In case of The Bulldog, it is well over 190 enforcement visits. And some dozen or more police raids.
The object is to grind their target down. Make it so that they cannot operate. Steal legal papers, to be used against their victim. And generally abuse laws, such as anti-terrorist, or anti-money laundering statute, to track every move that the whistleblower might make.
Not having an effective remedy, the target loses friends and family. And becomes an outcast. Mainly because, in not understanding what is going on behind the scenes, they tend to think the worst.
Thus giving neighbors with a grudge, ammunition that, as you will see, they use with relish. Many tripping over their own tongues, as they too fall into the trap of believing the gossip, when in reality it is has been fabricated. Malicious gossip is of course slander, if it is not true. Malicious gossip in emails, or other written communications, is libel.
Corruption lurks in every corridor of local and national buildings. Queen Elizabeth was asked for help. She declined. The duty to provide an effective remedy, now rests with King Charles.
Incompatibility in Human Rights terms, is where one statute does not comply with HR statute. The European Convention does include Article 13, the right to an effective remedy.
UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION AGAINST CORRUPTION
and injustice is such a big thing, that the subject is included in the
Development Goals (SDGs). There is a United Nations Convention
Against Corruption. As per General Assembly resolution 58/4 of 31 October 2003.
Chapter III of the Convention requires countries to establish criminal and other offences to cover a wide range of acts of corruption, if these are not already crimes under domestic law. In some cases, States are legally obliged to establish offences; in other cases, in order to take into account differences in domestic law, they are required to consider doing so. The Convention goes beyond previous instruments of this kind, criminalizing not only basic forms of corruption such as bribery and the embezzlement of public funds, but also trading in influence and the concealment and laundering of the proceeds of corruption. Offences committed in support of corruption, including money-laundering and obstructing justice, are also dealt with. Convention offences also deal with the problematic areas of private-sector corruption.
'The Colonial Bulldog' did not know what he was up against when he moved into a rural location in 1981, with Sussex police being named in Hansard, as the most corrupt police force, after investigation by Hampshire and Kent Constabularies, on the murder of the unarmed, James Ashley, during an armed raid (based on fabricated evidence) in the early hours of the morning.
Please use our MORAL COMPASS to navigate this story, or revisit our LANDING PAGE