A very dangerous man by all accounts. The Butcher of Britain if you will. Butchery being the severance of one animal's body parts from another. The chopping up of bodies, lopping of heads. Possibly, he was addicted to the adrenaline rush when giving the order to behead his victims. Thus, he needed more and more executions to quench his internal drug addiction. The fact he became obese, confirms his love of excess. Including his propensity to spend money.
It is likely he became addicted to blood letting. The adrenaline rush from each order to kill.
Henry VIII, Tudor king of England, was adept at re-writing rules to suit his royal purpose. He created the Church of England, ignoring all other faiths and scientific agnostics.* Making English and all of the United Kingdom's laws that flowed there-from, Christian inclined, doctored to the king's requirements. Therefore invalid in other religions, for not taking those into consideration, without the blessing of other faiths.
That is because Statute has to be approved by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal. We know the House of Lords is rife with corruption, with Titles for sale. But the Church of England was a made up religion, to enable Henry to bed more women on his own terms. A bit like spiking drinks at a night club, except, legalised. Leaving them without any Human Rights and in fear for their lives, if they disobeyed. Since the King's word was law.
Part thy hairy vestibule or feel the wrath of the axe man. It was virtually state sanction rape, with his targets fully aware of the dangers facing them. With the Bishops and Clerics there to help brainwash his victims. Just take one for England and smile. But you must bear a son as part of the bargain. Or, face the Tower.
What are the modern dangers of marrying into a royal family? Betwixt his many mistresses, Henry took six wives:
And so we have a legislative patchwork of laws that allow corruption at the highest levels - with few checks and balances. For example, there is no right of Appeal in the UK. If you are wrongly convicted by a force that is biased, there is no way of correcting that injustice. Mainly because the High Court judges who one has to petition for Leave, are rewarded with honours for towing the party line. They are thus unconsciously biased. Commonly known as discriminatory.
discrimination is illegal, save that there is no effective remedy for
the ordinary man of limited means.
Corruption lurks in every corridor of local and national buildings. Queen Elizabeth was asked for help. She declined. The duty to provide an effective remedy, now rests with King Charles. Her faith was manufactured as a means for King Henry to get his leg over. That did not seem to bother her, modified as it was at every opportunity to whitewash the origins.
Incompatibility in Human Rights terms, is where one statute does not comply with HR statute. The European Convention does include Article 13, the right to an effective remedy. British citizens are controlled, by taking that right away. Worse, there are many Quangos whose decisions (and are mostly secret) cannot be challenged. After reading all the evidence, would you agree that -it is pure Adolf Hitler: Disarming the Electorate? The cure is absolute transparency, in all public walks of life.
In 1530, at Hampton Court Palace,
King Henry VIII and his advisers penned a letter to Rome. In it, for the first time, Henry threatened to break with the Vatican and split off from the Catholic Church. As you might imagine, Rome probably thought he'd bitten off more than he could chew. But, four years later, in the 1534 Act of Supremacy, Henry carried through on that threat — and the
'Church of England' was born. This may have influenced the likes of Adolf
Hitler, for such political adulterations saw Henry become the ultimate dictator, something extremely hard to pull off in the 20th
Century - but a breeze in baronial England. Though the Fuhrer managed something reasonably closely aligned, and both dictators used extreme methods to eliminate political adversaries.
The United Kingdom does not yet have a Written Constitution. There is a debate running, as to abolition of the Monarchy. A written constitution might embody all faiths, ensure absolute transparency in Public Life, and prevent Corruption in local and international Politics. (Offshore accounts)
Bribing Britons with honours and Masonry in the Courts (or any secret society) CPS or police services, would be banned.
Controversial Netflix Documentary hit 20 million viewers.
* Judaism (Yahweh), Islam (Muslims: Allah) and Christianity (claim to) worship the same god. Baha'i, Buddhism (Divine Devas), Confucianism (Spirit), Hinduism (Brahman), Jainism, Shinto, Sikhism, Taoism, and Zoroastrianism. These are just a few of the most popular followings.
ABOUT THE ROYALS
King of England, is Charles
son, the former Duke
of Cambridge, Prince
William, is now the Prince of Wales, a King in waiting - as of the death
of Elizabeth II.
The previous King, Charles II, ruled from 1630 until 1685, gave a Royal Charter to export captured native Africans as slaves to British colonies, to his brother James II.
Queen Elizabeth I (Good Queen Bess), was famous for commissioning privateers to carry out acts of piracy on the high seas, to boost the coffers of her Treasury. As was Queen Anne 1665 - 1714. King George I carried on with privateers, then politics changed during his reign 1714 to 1727.